moustre: (Default)
moustre ([personal profile] moustre) wrote in [community profile] dagung2019-10-02 10:03 am
Entry tags:

Regarding Applications in November

Regarding Applications


Hey guys. First of all, we wanted to apologize for the delay in putting this up. We had to discuss things in more depth as a team after seeing everyone's feedback regarding the applications situation. I think it's obvious that the size of the game is a little overwhelming at times - we have 180+ characters after this last round, and with the holidays approaching and December being a slow month for nearly everyone in DWRP, our initial thought was that closing applications over the holidays would be the best route to take.

This decision was made pretty hastily, and should have been announced sooner. This was our mistake, and we apologize for that. Unfortunately, hindsight is 20/20 and we see how this could be upsetting to many of our players and potential players.

In the interest of fair compromise, we want to put forth two options for a player vote. We cannot manage a full application round in November if it's anywhere as large as this round was. However, it's on us that we didn't announce closing apps before this round began.

    Option One is that we keep applications closed in November. The January round would proceed as normal, with no caps. This would give us some breathing room during those four months to get on top of things.

    Option Two is that we do open applications in November, but we put a cap on the total number of applications that will be accepted - 40. While we do realize this could create a feeling of competition or scarcity, this is what we'll be able to handle during that time. Applications in January would be capped at 40 as well, to allow us some breathing room. For rounds after January, we would discuss and determine whether to keep the cap going forward, or to do away with it then, depending on the size of the game and how things are going. For this option as well, we may consider making the first day applications are open for new players only - would this be fair, considering the cap?

    Additionally: should Option Two win, this round would take place in the middle of November as a sort of special event, in order to work with our schedules. The dates would be announced on November's calendar at the first of the month. January's round will be at the end of January as usual.

    EDIT; ADDENDUM: If we proceed with a mid-November app round, there will be No Reservations. It will be a first come, first serve priority, with new players taking precedent if the vote passes. This is to ease the workload that applications cause over the coming holidays. January reserves would proceed as normal.

Please reply under the top level for the option you'd prefer we take, once per player, before October 6th. We will tally up the votes then and determine what the application schedule will be going forward.

We appreciate all of you and how willing you are to give us feedback, and how involved you all are with the game - it really means a lot to us. We have a fantastic playerbase and ultimately we want to do what's best for everyone.

Discussion is welcome on this post, but please keep it civil. If you'd like to take something to a more private venue, you can either PM us or comment here.

+1

[personal profile] proficience 2019-10-02 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Voting for this option!
Edited 2019-10-02 15:30 (UTC)
noblige: (Impassion)

Y

[personal profile] noblige 2019-10-02 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I think if option two does win, it would be more fair with a capped round to have a first day of apps open to new players only.
mantiger: 「manga」 (pic#13474100)

Y

[personal profile] mantiger 2019-10-02 03:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Echoing what was said above that a capped round would be more fair to be open to new players only!
atouts: (Default)

Y

[personal profile] atouts 2019-10-02 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Edited 2019-10-02 15:32 (UTC)
scatmaam: (Default)

+1

[personal profile] scatmaam 2019-10-02 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
scatmaam: (Default)

+1

[personal profile] scatmaam 2019-10-02 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
divineconfetti: (Default)

+1

[personal profile] divineconfetti 2019-10-02 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Edit: I wanted to amend this slightly and say that the mod team should only take on what they in good conscience think they can take on. If an app round capped at 40 seems too daunting/stressful, I think it would still be worth considering a round even further capped to 15-25, especially if it was locked to new prospective players. But I maintain that the mod team should only agree to what they think they can accomplish without confusion and/or delay.
Edited 2019-10-02 17:14 (UTC)
divineconfetti: (Default)

+1

[personal profile] divineconfetti 2019-10-02 03:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I think this is a good idea, and a fair compromise.
loadme: (Default)

+1

[personal profile] loadme 2019-10-02 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
faithlikeaseed: (blind - knucklebite)

Y

[personal profile] faithlikeaseed 2019-10-02 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I would go so far as to say all new player apps should be processed before current player apps & only then should acceptances go to new alts, but I'm a monster.

Alternately, and with an eye to Gadgets' concerns above: would restricting the app round exclusively to new players & possibly making it run over a shorter duration be a good compromise?

There's also the logistics of a new TDM I hadn't thought about here...
Edited 2019-10-02 16:23 (UTC)
atouts: (Default)

+1

[personal profile] atouts 2019-10-02 03:39 pm (UTC)(link)
plasticasshole: (✦ as you sleep tonight)

Y

[personal profile] plasticasshole 2019-10-02 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, open to new players only!
clerically: (Default)

[personal profile] clerically 2019-10-02 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
+1

Page 1 of 7